Archive for the ‘Christianity’ Category

on divorce and its effects

December 13, 2017

I could wish more people could be this honest about the wreckage created by divorce. We’re dealing with some of the effects in my family, and it’s horrible.

C. S. Lewis has a chapter, “Christian Marriage,” in his book Mere Christianity, and he pictures divorce this way:

[Christians] all regard divorce as something like cutting up a body, as a kind of surgical operation. Some of them think the operation so violent that it cannot be done at all; others admit it as a desperate remedy in extreme cases. They are all agreed that it is more like having both your legs cut off than it is like dissolving a business partnership or even deserting a regiment.

It would be a great benefit to society if this became more the perception of divorce, rather than making it easier and regarding it as a supposed boon to the parties involved. It’s horrible.

on the Pope and politics

September 18, 2017

Paul Rahe has written a scathing rebuke of both Pope Francis and the hierarchy of the Roman Catholic church for the scandal of making the church a partisan political program rather than a promoter of the gospel. That’s going to leave a mark.


January 2, 2012

I enjoyed coffee with a friend during Christmas break. We don’t get the chance to meet very often, so it’s always enjoyable to catch up when we do.

What I ponder when we meet is his devotion to progressive political policies. We don’t talk about it very much because our political viewpoints are closely interwoven with our understandings of the world, and there’s not much flexibility. But the futility of the centralized government project for accomplishing what he claims to want seems at such odds, it baffles me to hear him advocate for more of what has failed for the past 80 years.

So I ponder it, but it seems irresolvable.

on morality and government

March 15, 2011

One of the intellectual trends in Christianity today I find particularly curious is the general tendency to regard government as completely benign when it is expending revenues on social welfare projects and as completely corrupt when it is expending revenues on national security or on the development of business enterprises. Unless those businesses are receiving development funds for favored endeavors, in which case it is the sort of enlightened subsidy of business government should expend revenues on.

This has been captured in recent years by a variety of slogans and concepts about what Christians should support in government action and what they should oppose. What I find curious is the extent to which those slogans and concepts align along party lines in the United States. This seems remarkably improbable, if Christian thinking stands over against earthly entities and powers.

More likely, in my opinion, is that this sort of sloganeering and advocacy represents the result of a way of thinking about the world that privileges a specific set of concerns to the exclusion of considering anything else. The concept of the moral is restricted to what advances a particular set of concerns. Concepts of morality that would lead to a different course of action are ignored or disregarded. The problem makes itself clear in short-sided considerations to the detriment of the long-term.

It is admittedly difficult to make decisions based on the fullest set of conditions and considerations as possible. Timothy Dalrymple begins to explore this complexity in this post. It’s a useful corrective to so much over-simplified commentary on how to understand the U.S. Federal Government budget, deficit spending, and debt load.